www.dakurajsingh.com



*


DEMOCRACY & DICTATORSHIP.


(:


DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF DEMOCRACY:

"(STATE PRACTISING) GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE, DIRECT OR REPRESENTATIVE; THE POLITICALLY UNPRIVILEGED CLASS; SUPPORT OF PEOPLE TO STATE, LOCAL & INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY AGAINST FEDERAL POWERS."


DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF DICTATOR:

"ABSOLUTE RULER, USU. TEMPORARY OR IRREGULAR, OF A STATE, ESP. ONE WHO SUPPRESSES OR SUCCEEDS A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT; PERSON WITH ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY IN ANY SPHERE; ONE WHO DICTATES TO WRITER."


:)


...BUT WHAT IS...

"DEMOCRATIC DICTATORSHIP"???

...AND...

"DICTATED DEMOCRACY"???


(:


IF AN ELECTED LEADER BRINGS ABOUT PERSONALLY DESIRED CHANGES WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARLIAMENTARY LOOP-HOLES OF A CONSTITUTION, THEN CAN HE/SHE BE CALLED A "DEMOCRATIC DICTATOR" OR SHOULD IT BE SAID THAT HE/SHE IS "DICTATING DEMOCRACY"???

...OR...

IF AN ELECTED LEADER DICTATES DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES TO OTHER GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH OTHER "WAYS" OF LIFE, THEN CAN HE/SHE BE CALLED A "DEMOCRATIC DICTATOR"???

...OR...

IF AN ELECTED DEMOCRATIC LEADER FOREGOES THE DEMOCRATIC MEANS OF UNIVERSAL DIALOGUE AND USES DIRECT OR INDIRECT FORCE TO "REASON" WITH THE OPPOSITION, THEN CAN HE/SHE BE CALLED A "DEMOCRATIC DICTATOR" OR SHOULD IT BE SAID THAT HE/SHE IS "DICTATING DEMOCRACY"???

...OR...

IF A DICTATOR ALLOWS FOR A DEMOCRATIC POINT OF VIEW TO BE INCORPORATED WITHIN HIS/HER "ABSOLUTE RULE" FOR THE GOOD OF HIS/HER PEOPLE, THEN CAN HE/SHE BE CALLED A "DEMOCRATIC DICTATOR"???

...OR...

IF A DICTATOR TRIES TO CONVINCE OTHER GROUPS OF PEOPLE, BY DIRECT OR INDIRECT FORCE, TO HIS/HER POINTS OF VIEWS, THEN CAN HE/SHE BE CALLED A "DEMOCRATIC DICTATOR" OR SHOULD IT BE SAID THAT HE/SHE IS TRYING TO "DICTATE DEMOCRACY"???


(:


IN ALL THESE ABOVE CASES, IF THE INTENTION OF THE LEADERS IS EGOCENTRIC, THEN THE ONLY ONES TO SUFFER ARE "THE POLITICALLY UNPRIVILEGED CLASS" OF PEOPLE OF ANY COUNRTY.


:)


ALL GLOBAL LEADERS MUST REALISE THAT NO TWO PEOPLE ARE THE SAME.

NO TWO PEOPLE OF EVEN THE SAME FAMILY ARE THE SAME.

IN FACT, BOTH THESE COMPLEMENTARY FORCES EXIST IN EACH HUMAN:

SOMETIMES THE NEED TO COOPERATE
AND
SOMETIMES THE NEED TO DOMINATE.


(:


AN "EVERY-DAY" MARRIAGE IS GENERALLY BASED ON THESE TWO COMPLEMENTARY FORCES:

MAN DOMINATES - WOMAN DOMINATES.

MAN DOMINATES - WOMAN COOPERATES.

MAN COOPERATES - WOMAN DOMINATES.

MAN COOPERATES - WOMAN COOPERATES.


:)


ALL OF HUMANITY IS THE CHILDREN OF THE MARRIAGE OF THESE TWO FORCES BETWEEN THEIR PARENTS.


(:


ALSO, ALL OF HUMANITY IS NOT ONLY INHERENTLY INDEPENDENT AND FREE OF ITS PARENT FORCES BUT ALSO IS INHERENTLY INDEPENDENT AND FREE OF THE SET FORCES OF CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH GOVERN THEIR MINDS.


:)


NO SINGLE FORCE IS, OR CAN EVER BE, PREDOMINANT OVER THE OTHER.


(:


HENCE NO SINGLE "WAY" OF GOVERNANCE IS, OR CAN EVER BE, PREDOMINANT OVER THE OTHER.


:)


GLOBAL LEADERS MUST UNDERSTAND THAT ANY ATTEMPT TO PROVE THE "OTHER" WAY TO BE WRONG WILL ONLY LEAD TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THEIR OWN "WAY" AND WILL ULITIMATELY LEAD TO THE DESTRUCTION OF HUMANITY AS A WHOLE.


(:


THE "WAY" TOWARDS GLOBAL PEACE IS FOR THE GLOBAL LEADERS TO RECOGNIZE, APPRECIATE AND INCORPORATE THE QUALITIES OF THE "OTHER WAY" INTO THEIR OWN SYSTEMS OF GOVERNANCE WITHOUT BEING ASHAMED, APOLOGETIC OR EVEN NONCHALANT ABOUT IT.


:)


ALL GLOBAL LEADERS MUST ALWAYS REMEMBER

THAT

...UNITED WE STAND...


(:


AMEN.

*